About   Team   Contact   Submit    Home  


Database of SA Artists' Books  |  Exhibitions  |  Textual Research  |  News  |  Featured South African Artist's Book  |  Online Resources  |  Jack Ginsberg Bibliography on Artists' Books  |  Booknesses Archive

事实上产后丰胸是有用的,不过产后丰胸是一个循序渐进的过程丰胸产品,急不得也快不了,所以想要进行产后丰胸的妈妈们一定要有耐心丰胸方法,认真对待,一定会获得满意的成果。根据权威机构专家的建议丰胸效果,科学、健康的产后丰胸应该分为三个不同的阶段,每个阶段都有各自的侧重点丰胸产品粉嫩公主

      Return to Current

The MCBA Prize 2015 Finalists



Minnesota Center for Book Arts (MCBA) announces the five finalists for this year’s MCBA Prize 

This year’s competition, celebrated in coordination with MCBA’s 30th Anniversary, was judged by a jury of three experts in the field of book arts. The jurors reviewed a total of 170 submissions, representing 18 nations around the world from five continents, including 34 of the 50 United States.

Finalists for The MCBA Prize 2015 are, in alphabetical order:
– Ken Botnick, Diderot Project
– Sarah Bryant and David Allen, Figure Study
– Casey Gardner, Matter, Antimatter, and So Forth
– Sara Langworthy, On Physical Lines
– Robin Price, Love in the Time of War

The jury also awarded three Special Recognitions of Merit:
– Rhiannon Alpers, Remnants
– Candace Hicks, String Theory, Vol. III
– Gabriella Solti, The Book of Hours

The artworks will be on display at MCBA from July 17 through August 3, 2015. More photos, artist statements, and The MCBA Prize 2015 online gallery are available at MCBAPrize.org.

The MCBA Prize 2015 jury consists of:
– Aaron Cohick, proprietor of NewLights Press and master printer at The Press at Colorado College
– Daniel E. Kelm, book artist and founder of the Garage Annex School for Book Arts
– Jae Jennifer Rossman, Assistant Director for Special Collections, Yale University Library

UPDATE ON AWARDING OF PRIZE MADE ON 24 June 2015

Clarification on The MCBA Prize 2015 selection process

Dear friends of the book arts,

I recently received an anonymous letter regarding possible bias in the
finalist selection for the 2015 MCBA Prize. The writer requested
clarification and I am happy to provide that. I want to thank the writer
for communicating her/his concerns as others might have similar questions.

The MCBA Prize 2015 jurors were tasked with evaluating a field of 170
entries, and narrowing this field to five finalists, based on the photos
and entry materials supplied by each entrant. The jurors approached the
first stage of deliberation separately. Each juror independently evaluated
the field of entries and ranked a short list of candidates to bring to
deliberations. If an entry ranked high in the top five of a majority of the
jurors' individual lists, it advanced as a finalist with minimal
discussion. MCBA is aware of Daniel Kelm's familiarity with two of the
entries selected by the jury as finalists and his associations were
disclosed at the time of deliberations. Both of the works in question were
ranked in the top five lists of the other two jurors. Because of this, they
advanced as finalists.

In the interest of transparency, I have reviewed the jury's selection
process, and I am satisfied that the process was carried out fairly and
without bias. However, to ensure that the ultimate selection of the 2015
winner is not marred by any perception of conflict of interest, Daniel Kelm
has asked to recuse himself from the final selection process occurring on
July 24, 2015. I have accepted this request and the 2015 winner will be
selected by jurors Aaron Cohick and Jae Rossman.

We are dedicated to having a fair, open, and objective process, and we
strive to continually improve all aspects of this important competition.

Sincerely,
Jeff Rathermel
Executive Director, Minnesota Center for Book Arts



Page 1   1 | 
Click the image for a view of:

Click the image for a view of:


 Comments



Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | © David Paton. All rights reserved.